Benchmarks / CVE-Bench
CVE-Bench
Built by UIUC · released 31 Mar 2025
40 critical-severity CVEs (CVSS 9.0 or higher) in real web applications such as WordPress plugins and LLM tools. Each runs in an isolated sandbox. An agent must carry out a real attack, for example read the secret table, log in as admin, or execute code, and an evaluator checks the effect.
Frontier
12.5%
Success rate (one-day, 5 attempts)
AutoGPT with GPT-4o · agent: AutoGPT
Mar 2025 · Source: UIUC (benchmark maintainers)
Best result in the paper: 12.5% one-day and 10% zero-day with five attempts (abstract rounds to 13%). Measured on CVE-Bench v1 before the v2.0 grading fixes.
The best result is below 20% of the ceiling, or below half of human parity.
What it measures
Whether an agent can exploit a real web vulnerability end to end. In the zero-day setting the agent gets only the target; in the one-day setting it also gets a short description of the vulnerability. Success is one of eight attack outcomes checked by the sandbox. The paper reports success with one attempt and with five attempts. The headline here is one-day success with five attempts.
Success rate (one-day, 5 attempts): Share of the 40 CVEs exploited within five attempts when the agent is given a vulnerability description. Higher is better.
Status compares the frontier with a ceiling of 100%.
Facts
- Grain
- Task level: bounded tasks with a clear spec
- Environment
- cli, browser
- Grading
- state-check
- Tasks
- 40
- Contamination
- CVEs are public in the National Vulnerability Database with published details. Since v2.0, secrets are generated at runtime instead of hard-coded, in case old secrets appear in training data.
- Reuse
- Apache-2.0 (GitHub repository license). Reference exploits are available on request. (open-apache)
Limits to keep in mind
- Published results use gpt-4o-2024-11-20 with three agent frameworks from early 2025. There is no public leaderboard for newer models. Source
- v2.0 (2025-10-30) closed two shortcuts that agents used to pass tasks. The maintainers say GPT-4o agent success rates fell by up to 32.5 points after the fixes, so paper numbers overstate v1 ability. Source
- v2.1.0 (2026-01-12) replaced arbitrary file upload with remote code execution as an attack goal, so results across versions are not directly comparable. Source
- 40 tasks is a small set; one task equals 2.5 percentage points. Source
Recorded results
A selection that shows the frontier over time. The full leaderboard is at the source.
Timeline
Where it sits in the atlas
Go to the source
- Paper arxiv.org
- Code github.com
- Announcement open.substack.com
Last checked 23 Sep 2026 against 4 primary sources. See an error? Tell us.
How to cite
Credit the original work first: CVE-Bench by UIUC (https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17332).
Then, if you used this page:
Can Agents Work. "CVE-Bench: frontier results and sources." https://canagentswork.com/benchmarks/cve-bench/ (accessed 2026-09-24). CC BY 4.0.@misc{caw-cve-bench,
title = {{CVE-Bench: frontier results and sources}},
author = {{Can Agents Work}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://canagentswork.com/benchmarks/cve-bench/}},
note = {Accessed 2026-09-24. CC BY 4.0}
}